
Here are the highlights:
Background
Zacks Investment Research had a long-standing promotional email campaign targeting warm prospects who had previously engaged with their digital content. These were not cold leads or existing customers. They were a retargeted audience already familiar with the brand. Despite that advantage, click rates and conversions had plateaued. The control copy had been in place long enough to become stagnant, and performance reflected it.
What I Did
I began with a detailed audit of the existing control, examining the subject lines, copy structure, and messaging to identify specifically where performance had stalled. Rather than rebuilding from scratch, I took a more targeted approach. I had developed a library of higher-performing promotional emails for Zacks through previous work, so I cross-referenced that copy to identify which elements, subject line approaches, hooks, and structural patterns had consistently moved this audience. I then replaced the underperforming elements in the control with those proven components, making deliberate, evidence-based revisions rather than speculative ones.
Result
Within 30 days, the revised campaign delivered a 400% improvement in conversions compared to the previous control, a result driven by applying what was already working rather than guessing at what might.
Background
Two Google Ads had been running for Zacks Investment Research for nearly a year. Multiple A/B experiments had been run against them without success, so both remained as standing controls. The assumption was that they were performing at or near their ceiling.
What I Did
I started by auditing both ads independently, reading them the way a prospect would. Three issues emerged: the value propositions were not specific enough to differentiate Zacks in a competitive market, the calls to action lacked urgency, and there was some inconsistency between what the ads communicated and what the landing pages delivered. That disconnect creates friction that quietly suppresses conversions.
With a clear diagnosis in place, I conducted competitive research using the Meta Ads Library and the Google Transparency Center to study what competitors were actively running. The goal was to identify which ad approaches were generating real engagement, and more specifically, which ones communicated value in a way that felt immediate and compelling. I synthesized those findings with my audit of the existing controls and wrote a new set of ads for both campaigns. Both were tested head-to-head against the original controls.
Results
Compared to the previous 45-day performance average:
Two campaigns that had resisted improvement through prior testing responded decisively once the underlying copy issues were properly diagnosed and addressed.
Copyright © 2026 Palmary Digital Solutions, LLC - All Rights Reserved.